Entp a entp t в чем разница
Assertive Debater (ENTP-A) vs. Turbulent Debater (ENTP-T)
Debaters often express their vibrant personality type differently depending on whether they have a Turbulent or Assertive Identity. These personality traits tend to most affect confidence, self-esteem, susceptibility to stress, and emotional reactivity. How Debaters show these effects can be seen in several areas of life.
Social Interaction
Debaters are socially forward, and Identity can affect how and why.
Turbulent Debaters (ENTP-T) notably seek attention and approval, while Assertive Debaters (ENTP-A) usually show less need for positive feedback. Both personalities enjoy social status, but most Assertive Debaters approach it confidently, with a sense of being accepted. Though outgoing, their Turbulent counterparts often wrestle with self-consciousness when among other people.
73% of Turbulent Debaters say they are often afraid of being rejected by other people, versus 29% of Assertive Debaters.
This difference in confidence affects how Debater personalities relate with others. While Debaters generally aren’t focused on their feelings, Turbulent Debaters are relatively more willing to talk about them with others and tend to devote more effort to actively dealing with their negative feelings.
A notable majority of Turbulent Debaters say they work hard to get their anxieties, worries, and feelings under control, versus only half of Assertive Debaters. Turbulence may open the door to healthy self-examination and growth for this personality type.
77% of Turbulent Debaters say they get angry more easily than most people, compared to 37% of Assertive Debaters.
However, Identity affects conflicts as well. Most Debaters generally enjoy being provocateurs, but Turbulent Debaters are themselves more easily provoked to anger, jealousy, or envy. Assertive Debaters’ self-assurance helps stabilize them – they’re willingly feisty but less reactive.
Endeavor and Accomplishment
When it comes to goals and accomplishments, Debater personalities are usually optimistic risk-takers with little inhibition. However, when their impulses lead to unwanted outcomes, Identity differences become more apparent.
82% of Assertive Debaters say they feel like they are in control, even when things are going wrong, compared to 53% of Turbulent Debaters.
But while Assertive Debaters may not react as negatively or openly to problems, they also may not put as much effort into self-monitoring or feel as ashamed of any missteps. Their sense of comfort with themselves applies regardless of the results of their thoughts or actions.
64% of Turbulent Debaters say they see many of their mistakes as failures, versus 39% of Assertive Debaters.
Turbulent variants are also more likely to react to failure with vocal defensiveness or blaming themselves or others and to respond more vigorously to criticism.
Debater personality types, in general, can be quite willful and competitive, though Assertive Debaters are less likely to be annoyed when someone else is better at something. Their self-confidence is more durable, even when their success or superiority is uncertain.
Self-Perception
Debaters are known for their ready adaptability, and Assertive Debaters are somewhat more likely to say that stress actually helps them focus. Their Turbulent counterparts are much less likely to feel that they can effectively manage the stress in their lives, and they more often take steps to avoid it.
64% of Turbulent Debaters find it hard not to let a moderately stressful event affect them negatively, versus just 20% of Assertive Debaters.
It’s worth noting that these two personality variants have somewhat differing responses to stress. Assertive Debaters are a bit more likely to engage in physical activity as an outlet, while Turbulent Debaters are prone to being even more talkative than normal.
Unfortunately, Turbulent Debaters are also more prone to struggling with negative self-perception. They’re less likely to be satisfied when looking back on their life overall or even just with their physical appearance.
53% of Turbulent Debaters say they are generally happy with the way they look, compared to 84% of Assertive Debaters.
While the Turbulent personality trait can make some less comfortable with themselves, Debaters of both Identities have roughly similar boldness and optimism overall. Interestingly, it’s the Turbulent ones who are less likely to ask for help, often because they fear it may make them look weak.
It’s also important to mention that compared to Assertive Debaters, Turbulent Debaters are significantly more likely to agree that negative emotions affect their ability to think clearly and significantly less likely to feel like they have control over their emotions.
Summary
Despite these noted differences, Debaters are more alike than not. The qualities that make this personality type stand out are vivid, regardless of their Identity. Some Debaters may feel the effects of misfortune or doubt more keenly, but they usually bounce back in their own way, just as determined to triumph.
In the end, both Assertive and Turbulent Debaters often share similar paths in life, even if they walk with slightly different gaits and falter for different reasons. Most importantly, this personality type can overcome any pitfalls of either Identity trait through awareness and practice.
Given that they have so many habits and qualities in common, learning about their respective Identity differences is a great way for all Debaters to make strides in their personal growth.
ENTP-A vs. ENTP-T Personality Type
ENTPs are best known for the mental quickness, versatility, and creativity. These talents lend themselves well to any number of endeavors, such as the arts, journalism, politics, entrepreneurship, and various forms of leadership. The ENTP’s mental agility and cleverness also contribute to a knack for problem-solving, debate, and improvisation.
While it may seem there is precious little that the multi-talented ENTP can’t do, like any personality type, they do have their weaknesses. Like other intuitives, attending to the details of everyday life is not their strong suit. Since their heads are often “in the clouds,” they may lose track of time, forget to pay the bills, or struggle to locate their car keys.
Moreover, because the ENTP mind is always jumping from one idea to the next, this type can struggle with mental focus, which is why many ENTPs are diagnosed with attention-deficit disorder (ADD). While they are invariably “idea people,” they can fall short when it comes to executing and following-through on their ideas.
With that said, it is important to recognize that ENTPs’ difficulty with follow-through is not merely a matter of their being distracted or unfocused. The fact is that this type is easily bored and can quickly lose interest in something once its initial novelty has worn off or no longer inspires creative thinking. In other words, ENTPs are all about novelty. Carl Jung got it right in his classic work, Psychological Types, where he observed that the extraverted intuitive type has:
A keen nose for anything new and in the making…stable conditions suffocate him…he seizes on new objects or situations with enthusiasm only to abandon them cold-bloodedly.
New ideas. New possibilities. New projects. New ventures (and adventures). Such are the lifeblood of this type.
The notion that there are 16 personality types was first propounded by Myers and Briggs in the mid-20 th century. Circa 2014, a website called 16 Personalities injected another variable into the personality equation, appending the letter T or A to each of the types. According to 16 Personalities, the A variable stands for “assertive” and the T for “turbulent.” We will now take a look at this A-T variable and its manifestations in the “ENTP-A” vs. “ENTP-T” types.
ENTP-A (Assertive) Personality
As extraverts, ENTPs are all naturally assertive to a certain extent. According to “Big Five” personality researcher Colin DeYoung, Assertiveness constitutes one of two primary “meta-traits” of extraversion (the other being Enthusiasm). Thus, there is a sense in which appending the A variable to the ENTP (or any extraverted type) seems a bit redundant.
In what ways are ENTPs assertive? Assertiveness involves having a “strong personality,” being active / proactive, and avidly pursuing one’s interests or ambitions; some have described it in terms of being a “go-getter.” On an interpersonal level, assertiveness entails having the courage and confidence to express one’s views and to take the lead when necessary.
With this in mind, we would expect the ENTP-A type to not only be interpersonally assertive, but also to be generally proactive and intrepid. Thus, this type is particularly likely to assume leadership roles, be it as an entrepreneur, journalist, politician, college professor, etc.
The ENTP-A does not shy away from taking risks or tackling new challenges, but actually thrives on doing so. While other types may buckle in stressful situations, those of this type are confident that their nimble minds can help them navigate whatever new challenges come their way. Indeed, some will intentionally take risks in hopes of bringing more intensity or excitement to their lives.
ENTP-T (Turbulent) Personality
It’s difficult not to notice a substantial overlap between the Turbulence concept and the Big Five domain—Neuroticism. Individuals testing high in Neuroticism tend to be more anxious, depressed, moody, self-conscious, and/or emotionally volatile than lower scorers. One can thus understand why the notion of Turbulence might serve as a suitable descriptor for this realm of personality.
Although I don’t consider Turbulence to be the conceptual opposite of Assertiveness (passivity would be more suitable in this respect), one can nonetheless see how they might be inversely correlated. Here are some examples: If one is depressed, she’s less likely to be active and motivated. If one is anxious or self-conscious, he is less apt to assert himself in a confident way. If one is moody and volatile, she will typically be a less effective leader.
Moreover, we can imagine how the ENTP-T might have even greater problems with follow-through. Due to their volatility, the ENTP-T may lack the strength or tenacity to persist when times get tough, instead flitting from one job, project, or relationship to the next. Others may thus accuse them of being fickle, never satisfied, or lacking in patience or staying power.
Of course, some degree of turbulence is expected from any perceiving (P) type. It is challenging for P types to persist and follow-through once their initial intrigue or excitement with something has waned. Thus, we would expect the ENTP, in preferring both extraversion and perceiving, to have some measure of both assertiveness (E) and turbulence (P). The issue then is really only one of proportion.
Which is More Optimal?
Unlike other personality domains (e.g., E-I, S-N, T-F, J-P etc.), one could make the case that high Neuroticism / Turbulence is less desirable or optimal than low to moderate levels. Obviously, there is a point in which anxiety, depression, or related issues can become debilitating or even life-threatening. One might therefore argue that these issues ought not be grouped with what we might call “neutral” or “normal” personality traits but should instead be considered separately under the domain of mental health. This may be why neither Jung nor Myers-Briggs included anything like Turbulence in their original frameworks.
Irrespective of the A-T variable, all ENTPs strive to live meaningful and effective lives. They want to understand themselves, including their signature strengths, and discover their rightful place in the world. Understanding their personality type can help them move forward in this quest, furnishing them with important insights about the nature of their mind and how it might be most optimally and meaningfully employed.
If you want to learn more about ENFPs, you’ve come to the right place. We have written extensively about the intuitive (N) personality types, especially the intuitive (N) perceiving (P) types. We’ve even developed an online course—Finding Your Path as an INFP, INTP, ENFP, ENTP—specifically tailored to these types. If you haven’t already done so, be sure to explore our in-depth ENTP profile:
Личность «Полемист» — характеристика и психологический портрет
Не бойтесь следовать по небезопасному пути независимого мыслителя, подвергая каждую идею опасности быть раскритикованной. Смело высказывайте свои мысли, не боясь выглядеть «чокнутым», но боясь получить клеймо конформизма.
Томас Дж. Уотсон, предприниматель и директор компании IBM
Представители типа личности Полемист – настоящие адвокаты дьявола, способные разрушить любые мнения и аргументы на микроскопические и практически ничего не значащие детали, выставив весь этот процесс на общее обозрение.
Ключевые особенности личности
При этом, в отличие от остальных, и нужно сказать, более устремлённых личностей, психологические портреты которых описаны на сайте «Тесты Онлайн» — Полемист делает это ради удовольствия, не преследуя никакой высшей цели.
Ни один другой человек не обожает так ментальные дуэли, как наши сегодняшние герои! Само участи в таком поединке даёт им возможность отработать новые механизмы и техники, применить острый ум, воспользоваться обширной базой знаний и выступить в роли детектива, объединив в доказательства собственной правоты разрозненные идеи.
О плюсах и минусах личности
Наслаждаясь своим причастием к идеям нонконформизма, большая часть Полемистов периодически практикуют ментальное упражнение, суть которого заключается в проверке на сомнения общепринятого образа мышления, что делает их очень полезными при проверке различных систем/механизмов на прочность или там, где нужно обновить направление развития.
При этом, такие люди практически бесполезны в ежедневной рутине, которая крайне необходима для внедрения предложений Полемистов, которые хоть и любят мыслить стратегически, закрепляя мысли мозговыми штурмами, но всячески избегают приземлённых задач, предпочитая делегировать их «рядовым».
Благодаря тому, что общая численность Полемистов в мире не превышает 3% от всего населения – остальные могут наслаждаться плодами их идей, не опасаясь быть слишком обычными.
Масла в огонь подливает и безжалостная откровенность наших героев. Так как представители типа личности Полемист не лезут в карман за словом и не могут похвастать чувствительностью/тактичностью/сочувствием – общение с ними может не просто доставлять дискомфорт, но быть невыносимо.
Так, более чувствительные типы личности, не склонные к участию в конфликтных ситуациях, попросту избегают встреч с Полемистами, считая их выскочками и бунтарями/дикарями, не способными мыслить рационально.
Вышеописанное выводит из себя Полемистов ещё больше и приводит в ярость. А спустя какое-то время, они обнаруживают, что их невинная, казалось бы, забава стала причиной ссоры с близкими и сожгла десятки мостов. Поэтому, в первую очередь, таким личностям стоит научиться уважать личное мнение других и не воспринимать их эмоции/чувства лишь как инструмент для получения нужной информации.
Общаясь с окружающими таким образом – большая часть Полемистов не терпит, когда люди начинают с ними нянчится и/или стараются отойти от темы разговора. Особенно, если Полемист просит оказать ему какую-то услугу.
Несмотря на то, что Полемист чувствует себя необходимым обществу и уважаемым им за уверенность в собственных силах, стратегическое мышление, чувство юмора – такой человек не может использовать эти качества для развития романтических отношений или глубокой дружбы, что делает его несчастным. Из-за этого наши герои, как правило, уходят в долгие раздумья, выходя из них в ещё более укреплённой броне цинизма.
Соответствие 16 типов личностей по соционике и типологии Майерс-Бриггс (MBTI)
Если вы уже знаете свой Тим по соционике или определили психотип с помощью сайта 16 личностей (16 personalities)
прочитайте бесплатное описание психотипа на сайте, затем переходите к чтению Полного руководства
Тип по MBTI — ENTJ, В Код Личности — Полководец, в 16 личностей — Командир (ENTJ-A / ENTJ-T), в соционике — Джек Лондон (ЛИЭ, логически-интуитивный экстраверт)
Тип по MBTI — ENTP, В Код Личности — Изобретатель, в 16 личностей — Полемист (ENTP-A / ENTP-T), в соционике — Дон Кихот (ИЛИ, интуитивно-логический интроверт)
Тип по MBTI — INTJ, В Код Личности — Аналитик, в 16 личностей — Стратег (INTJ-A / INTJ-T), в соционике — Робеспьер (ЛИИ, логически-интуитивный интроверт)
Тип по MBTI — INTP, В Код Личности — Инноватор, в 16 личностей— Ученый (INTP-A / INTP-T), в соционике — Бальзак (ИЛИ, интуитивно-логический интроверт)
Тип по MBTI — ENFJ, В Код Личности — Наставник, в 16 личностей — Тренер (ENFJ-A / ENFJ-T), в соционике — Гамлет (ЭИЭ, этически-интуитивный экстраверт)
Тип по MBTI — ENFP, В Код Личности — Коммуникатор, в 16 личностей — Борец, (ENFP-A / ENFP-T) в соционике — Гексли (ИЭЭ, интуитивно-этический экстраверт)
Тип по MBTI — INFJ, В Код Личности — Провидец, в 16 личностей — Активист (INFJ-A / INFJ-T), в соционике — Достоевский (ЭИИ, этически-интуитивный интроверт)
Тип по MBTI — INFP, В Код Личности — Идеалист, в 16 личностей — Посредник (INFP-A / INFP-T), в соционике — Есенин (ИЭИ, интуитивно-этический интроверт)
Тип по MBTI — ESTJ, В Код Личности — Администратор, в 16 личностей — Менеджер ( ESTJ-A / ESTJ-T), в соционике — Штирлиц (ЛСЭ, логически-сенсорный экстраверт)
Тип по MBTI — ESFJ, В Код Личности — Учитель, в 16 личностей — Консул ( ESFJ-A / ESFJ-T), в соционике — Гюго (ЭСЭ, этически-сенсорный экстраверт)
Тип по MBTI — ISTJ, В Код Личности — Инспектор, в 16 личностей — Администратор ( ISTJ-A / ISTJ-T), в соционике — Максим Горький (ЛСИ, логически-сенсорный интроверт)
Тип по MBTI — ISFJ, В Код Личности — Хранитель, в 16 личностей— Защитник ( ISFJ-A / ISFJ-T), в соционике — Драйзер (СЛИ, сенсорно-этический интроверт)
Тип по MBTI — ESTP, В Код Личности — Предприниматель, в 16 личностей — Делец ( ESTP-A / ESTP-T), в соционике — Жуков (СЛЭ, сенсорно-логический экстраверт)
Тип по MBTI — ESFP, В Код Личности — Душа компании, в 16 личностей — Развлекатель ( ESFP-A / ES FP-T), в соционике — Наполеон (СЭЭ, сенсорно-этический экстраверт)
Тип по MBTI — ISTP, В Код Личности — Мастер, в 16 личностей — Виртуоз ( ISTP-A / ISTP-T) в соционике — Габен (СЛИ, сенсорно-логический интроверт)
Тип по MBTI — ISFP, В Код Личности — Художник, в 16 личностей — Артист ( ISFP-A / ISFP-T), в соционике — Дюма (СЭИ, сенсорно-этический интроверт)
Assertive Commander (ENTJ-A) vs. Turbulent Commander (ENTJ-T)
Commander personality types generally think and act big. But their Identity personality traits can make a difference in how they express themselves and how they react to life, other people, and the world around them. For all their distinct and vivid common characteristics, Assertive Commanders (ENTJ-A) and Turbulent Commanders (ENTJ-T) can have some deep differences from each other.
Let’s examine how being Assertive or Turbulent affects these notably driven and expressive people.
Internal Effects
While both personality types tend to forge ahead willfully in life, one of the biggest differences between Assertive and Turbulent Commanders is how they respond inside to routine stress. Assertive Commanders are much more likely to keep their stress under control. They have an easier time moving forward in a resolute Commander way, despite the feelings and thoughts that stress brings.
93% of Assertive Commanders agree that they effectively manage the stress in their life, versus 47% of Turbulent Commanders.
It’s much more difficult for Turbulent Commanders to prevent even moderately stressful events from affecting them. However, Commanders, in general, see themselves as being on top of things and likely to rise to meet life’s challenges. So, while Turbulent members of this personality type may experience stress more acutely, it doesn’t necessarily derail their momentum in life.
It may alter their approach somewhat, though, when stress leads to negative perceptions. Turbulent Commanders are more likely to feel pessimistic following a setback, and this can affect their decision-making process. Notably, they’re more likely than their Assertive counterparts to take steps to avoid stress or seek a pause to gather themselves.
By contrast, Assertive Commanders are more likely to feel that stress helps them focus or even perform better. Both variants of this personality type can be aggressive and energetic. But in the case of Assertive individuals, stress is more likely to feed their motivation – and perhaps even increase their energy.
68% of Assertive Commanders say they perform tasks better when under stress than when they are calm, compared to 50% of Turbulent Commanders.
When it comes to broader emotions, Assertive Commanders likely have an easier time mastering their state of mind as well. The Identity characteristics that make them less vulnerable to the effects of stress can also decrease the influence of negative emotions. This is significant because Commanders tend to prize their sense of dispassionate and decisive rationality. The Assertive trait can support this personality type’s clarity of thought.
62% of Turbulent Commanders agree that negative emotions affect their ability to think clearly to a large degree, versus 38% of Assertive Commanders.
Emotional control is important to most Commanders – they value it in themselves and respect it in others. But the way that Identity affects how these personality types are influenced by emotion isn’t just about sensitivity to negative effects or feelings. It can also play a part in how strongly, freely, and readily Commanders experience and express a wide range of emotions.
For example, compared to their Assertive counterparts, Turbulent Commanders are relatively open to “softer” or more positive feelings as well.
70% of Turbulent Commanders say they keep many things in their room that hold special sentimental value for them, compared to 45% of Assertive Commanders.
But while Assertive Commanders may be less likely to connect with inner sentiments, they’re also less likely to delve into darker feelings. This benefits their self-esteem. Not only is their emotional state more stable, but it’s usually more self-forgiving. Assertive Commanders are far more likely to report that they rarely feel ashamed of themselves.
Overall, neither variant of this personality type is known for avoiding conflict or difficulty. But it’s notable that Assertive Commanders tend to have an easier time letting go of agitated thoughts or feelings that may arise from such situations. These personalities are far less likely to report that they lie awake at night thinking about the things that upset them during the day. By contrast, Turbulent Commanders often struggle to move on or relax once they have become upset.
External Effects
One of the reasons Assertive Commanders seem to have an easier time letting go might be that they aren’t as easily upset in the first place. They have the same capacity to become upset, but it’s not as likely to occur as it is for Turbulent Commanders.
An Assertive Identity offers Commanders a somewhat greater – though far from absolute – immunity to negative reactions to their experiences with people. They are far less likely than Turbulent Commanders to report being easily upset by other people.
91% of Assertive Commanders feel like they have control over their emotions, versus 59% of Turbulent Commanders.
But Turbulent Commanders’ more sensitive reactions can also have positive implications. When (or if) Commanders themselves are the source of conflict or offense, it’s the Turbulent personalities that are more likely to be bothered by their actions.
Commanders can be brusque, but Turbulent Commanders are much more likely to report that they feel anxious if they know they’ve upset someone. Accordingly, they may likewise demonstrate more concern. Assertive Commanders are less likely to feel bad if they’ve hurt someone and, consequently, aren’t as likely to take care to avoid doing so.
54% of Turbulent Commanders say they pick up most of their social cues from either the environment they’re in or other people they’re with, compared to 24% of Assertive Commanders.
Even in dynamic, focused personality types like Commanders, the Turbulent trait is usually associated with greater emotional volatility. This can affect their conscious output just as much as their reactions, but not always negatively. It can apply to positive interactions as well. For example, Turbulent Commanders are more likely to report that they enjoy openly showing affection for people they care about.
Commanders also externally express their Identity differences in ways beyond the social realm. One of the most notable contrasts between the variants is their sense – and demonstration – of confidence. Assertive Commanders are broadly possessed of greater confidence, both innately and in response to external events.
92% of Assertive Commanders rate their overall level of self-confidence as high or very high, compared to 51% of Turbulent Commanders.
This difference in confidence can have far-reaching effects in life, influencing how quickly Commanders recover from unwanted outcomes and how optimistic they are. Both personality variants tend to be bold, but Turbulent Commanders are more prone to worry and less likely to maintain their motivation in the face of difficulty.
87% of Assertive Commanders say their motivation is more likely to increase when something proves more difficult than they thought it would be, compared to 56% of Turbulent Commanders.
One manifestation of confidence is the way Commander personalities view themselves physically. Assertive Commanders are less likely to be anxious about their body image and somewhat more likely to consider themselves attractive. Moreover, their opinion of the way they look is less likely to change often.
78% of Assertive Commanders agree that they’re generally happy with the way they look, versus 45% of Turbulent Commanders.
This echoes the general theme of stability versus volatility that is seen between the two Identities, as well as relating to the specific subject of confidence in the way they look.
Summary
Conclusions
There are many unique ways that this powerful personality type displays the differences between Assertive and Turbulent Identity. It’s important to note that each Identity is associated with specific challenges and advantages in certain situations, but neither personality trait automatically has greater benefits. Given this, learning to leverage the best of their traits while also balancing their extremity helps Commanders lead happy and successful lives.